Keeping it would mean that we have a bunch or inept and corrupt politicians %26quot;representing%26quot; us and ruining our country. Removing the senate would mean that we are opening the way for the whole legislative branch to be removed, thus allowing us to eb stripped of our freedoms.
The system is not the problem, the people who run it are.Should we keep, change, or remove the senate?Actually I believe all of them should be limited to just 2 terms so they don't get fat and complacent.Perhaps then they would realize they work for us and not the other way around as they spend money like a drunk person with a new credit card and no limit to max out.Should we keep, change, or remove the senate?We should impeach every Republican who's proven themselves dedicated to preventing our recovery.
They WANT us to collapse, so they can blame it on the Democrats, and regain power.Should we keep, change, or remove the senate?Just get rid of all democrats...
We have to term limit the senators. 2 terms max. We also need to term limit the house - seven terms maximum there.
Need to let these crooks move on and do something else with their lives. They certainly aren't helping our country with anything.Should we keep, change, or remove the senate?We cannot remove neither the representatives neither the senate, because .
For the simple reason that we irresponsibly elect them and continue supporting them.
Why we are in bankcruptcy because families spend to much ,governments, state, federal (Senate) they approve to much expenses with money that doesn't have only, they only Sign the credits papers so that our generations pay it.
The answer is that the justice should be applied equally all without exception, so much to representatives, senators, presidents, bankers etc.Should we keep, change, or remove the senate?It would take an amendment to the constitution to remove the Senate. It's highly doubtful that the Senate would let something like that happen. Remember, the job of a bureaucracy's is to justify it's existence.